Superposition 

Case Studies
  1. Wind & Rain Bridge
  2. Sun Room 
  3. Living Museum
  4. Lantern
  5. Backpack Housing

Research & Exhibition
  1. Tolerance & Transformation
  2. The Residual City 
  3. The Village Code 
  4. Ceramic Structures 
  5. Vertical/Reciprocal 
  6. Future Campus
  7. Framework

Superstudio
  
    Info
    Superposition is an experimental architecture studio founded by Donn Holohan and Elspeth Lee which integrates teaching, research and practice. Working between Hong Kong and Ireland, the studio merges vernacular means and methods with digital tools with a view toward making architecture which is specific rather than generic, pragmatic but not utilitarian, and with a strongly community-centred view of evolving tradition and place.

    Read more →

    Design Studio Masters Thesis (Loading)
    Superstudio
    is focused on developing modes of architectural production that rely less on broadly repeatable and generalized solutions to the “problem of architecture.” Instead, its seeks to test the proposition that with current advances in technology, highly responsive and specific approaches to making are not only possible but essential.

    Exploring the integration and synthesis of situated knowledge systems, craft practices together with advancements in materials and computational technologies - Superstudio aims to disrupt the idea that scalability is only possible through ubiquity.

    Agenda 

    The discourse surrounding contemporary architectural practice has shifted markedly, from what we build to how we build it. Increasingly, the conversation is concentrated on adaptation, reuse, and minimizing new construction wherever possible. This, we believe, is necessary and well-intentioned. However, we also believe that we must build. For, despite the presence of vacancy, waste, and inefficiencies, scarcity continues to afflict the built environment in both the developed and, in particular, the developing world. However, it is equally clear that we must adopt different material strategies and construction methodologies. 

    Our evolving research practice and teaching are linked, and focus on finding means and methods to utilize natural, irregular, and locally sourced materials, to incorporate community labor alongside skilled craftspeople, and aim to reevaluate and challenge standardized models for procurement, certification, and performance. We believe that certain dogmas have arisen that act as barriers to achieving true sustainability in architectural production. In particular, we see the ideologies inherent in replaceable parts, standardization, modularity, and financialization, which emerged during periods characterized by unbridled optimism and a steadfast belief in perpetual growth, have now become dangerous engines of precarity. 

    Socialising Construction (Meitheal)
    Can efficient and equitable labour models be developed around one-off material systems that blend professional and community-based engagement, moving away from entirely generic and privately funded approaches?

    Empirical Certification and Testing
    How can we leverage precedent studies, on-site testing, and management practices to mitigate risk in the certification of new and irregular material systems?

    Site as Classroom / Studio as Workshop
    In what ways can universities become an integral aspect of project delivery in mainstream architecture, transforming teaching and learning to become actively integrated into real construction?

    Brief Through Consensus
    How can we formalise the generation of architectural design briefs directly with a community, as opposed to having the built environment determined solely by top-down private investments or government agencies?

    Temporality and Maintenance
    How can architecture models shift their focus from relying on perceived durable and maintenance-free materials to embracing a model centred around accessible repair.